Carol Stavropoulos v. Evan Firestone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the asserted employer action was “not substantial enough to be actionable” under the First Amendment
• “[W]e regularly draw cases applying [the requirement that a plaintiff asserting a First Amendment retaliation claim establish an important condition of employment] to inform our analysis of Title VII retaliation claims.”
• “[Plaintiff] did not present this theory to the district court when summary judgment motions were pending.... Because [plaintiff] failed to properly present her [new] theory to the district court, we decline to consider it on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).