Skip to main content
· 2/7/2012

Walden v. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention

Citations

  • 669 F.3d 1277
  • 2012 WL 371871
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 2389
  • 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,410
  • 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the employer’s offer of a reasonable accommodation triggers the employee’s duty to make a good-faith attempt to accommodate her needs through the employer’s offered accommodation
  • holding that Malesko USCA11 Case: 22-13847 Document: 12-1 Date Filed: 11/14/2023 Page: 11 of 13 22-13847 Opinion of the Court 11 “foreclosed inferring a constitutional tort remedy against a private entity” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • concluding that “close temporal proximity of three weeks” between the employee’s “pro- tected activity and [the] . . . adverse employment action” was not enough to establish pretext when the employer supplied a legiti- mate reason for the adverse action
  • noting that we can affirm a grant of summary judgment on any ground supported by the record, including grounds on which the district court did not rely
  • finding that an employer’s offer of help to the employee in obtaining a new position is a reasonable accommodation as a matter of law
  • holding, in a Title VII case, that a temporal proximity of three weeks was not enough to overcome evidence showing that the employee was removed for a legitimate reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Wilson, Seymour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.