Sixth Circuit· 3/11/1993
Mayer v. Mylod
Citations
- 988 F.2d 635
- 25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 151
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4415
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the “purpose of Rule 12(b)(6) is to allow a defendant to test whether, as a matter of law, the plaintiff is entitled to legal relief even if everything alleged in the complaint is true.”
- Sixth Circuit panel concluding that the court must look at cautionary statements on a fact- and case-specific basis — Sinay panel erred in applying a per se approach
- Sixth Circuit — applying same approach
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rodriguez-Bruno v. Doral MortgageFirst Circuit· 1995-06-23· cited 463×
- Rubinstein v. CollinsFifth Circuit· 1994-05-05· cited 210×
- Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund v. Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLCSixth Circuit· 2012-12-03· cited 88×
- D.E. & J Ltd. Partnership v. ConawayE.D. Michigan· 2003-09-19· cited 47×
- Lanni v. EnglerE.D. Michigan· 1998-02-13· cited 46×
- Kentucky Laborers District Council Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Hill & Knowlton, Inc.W.D. Kentucky· 1998-09-30· cited 46×
- QQC, INC. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.E.D. Michigan· 2003-04-16· cited 44×
- In Re Immune Response Securities LitigationS.D. California· 2005-06-07· cited 43×
- In Re Cardinal Health Inc. Securities LitigationsS.D. Ohio· 2006-04-12· cited 31×
- Delawder v. Platinum Financial Services Corp.S.D. Ohio· 2005-03-01· cited 30×
- In Re Number Nine Visual Technology Corp. Securities LitigationD. Massachusetts· 1999-06-01· cited 28×
- Gliatta v. Tectum, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2002-07-08· cited 27×
- Fremont Reorganizing Corp. v. DukeE.D. Michigan· 2011-09-12· cited 21×
- Florists' Transworld Delivery, Inc. v. Fleurop-InterfloraE.D. Michigan· 2003-04-10· cited 20×
- Willing v. Lake Orion Community Schools Board of TrusteesE.D. Michigan· 1996-05-06· cited 17×
- In Re Sprint Corp. Securities LitigationD. Kansas· 2002-09-30· cited 17×
- Asp v. TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLCS.D. Ohio· 2008-12-31· cited 16×
- Arthur v. Armco, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2000-03-07· cited 16×
- Vennittilli v. Primerica, Inc.E.D. Michigan· 1996-09-24· cited 13×
- Bowens v. Aftermath EntertainmentE.D. Michigan· 2003-03-28· cited 13×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 3,007×
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 2,928×
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,751×
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisNinth Circuit· 1992-09-28· cited 950×
- Blackie v. BarrackNinth Circuit· 1975-09-25· cited 871×
- Mayer v. MylodSixth Circuit· 1993-03-11· cited 736×
- Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. SandbergSupreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 584×
- Lynn Sinay, David Rosenberg (90-4075) and Aline Halye (91-3051) v. The Lamson & Sessions Company Russell Every John Schulze and Gene BuddSixth Circuit· 1991-11-07· cited 250×
- Craighead v. E.F. Hutton & Co.Sixth Circuit· 1990-03-28· cited 206×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,048 Milton E. Dupuy v. Clarence O. Dupuy, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1977-05-09· cited 196×
- Nishiyama v. Dickson CountySixth Circuit· 1987-03-18· cited 133×
- Herbert S. GLICK v. Joseph F. CAMPAGNA and Washington Marketing & Financial, Inc., AppellantsThird Circuit· 1980-01-03· cited 37×
- Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, and Its Local No. 8-631 v. Delta Refining CompanySixth Circuit· 1960-03-23· cited 23×
- Kentucky Educators Public Affairs Council v. Kentucky Registry of Election FinanceSixth Circuit· 1982-05-13· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.