Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 3/11/1993

Mayer v. Mylod

Citations

  • 988 F.2d 635
  • 25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 151
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the “purpose of Rule 12(b)(6) is to allow a defendant to test whether, as a matter of law, the plaintiff is entitled to legal relief even if everything alleged in the complaint is true.”
  • Sixth Circuit panel concluding that the court must look at cautionary statements on a fact- and case-specific basis — Sinay panel erred in applying a per se approach
  • Sixth Circuit — applying same approach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.