Rubinstein v. Collins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that questions of whether disclosures were sufficiently cautionary may not always be resolved as a matter of law
• noting that, “under Rule 10b-5, a duty to speak the full truth arises when a defendant undertakes a duty to say anything.”
• stating that -43- questions of whether disclosures were sufficiently cautionary may not always be resolved as a matter of law
• characterizing sufficiently suspicious trading as “presumptively probative of bad faith and scienter”
• refusing to look beyond the four corners of the complaint when reviewing a motion to dismiss even though defendants claimed that the alleged insider stock sales \were innocuous because they were made in response to tax considerations\
• reversing a dismissal of an omission-based claim alleging that the defendants made “various optimistic projections” but refused to disclose “material, firm- specific adverse facts that affect[ed] the validity or plausibility of that prediction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).