Fifth Circuit· 5/5/1994

Rubinstein v. Collins

Citations

20 F.3d 160
1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9730
1994 WL 137756

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that questions of whether disclosures were sufficiently cautionary may not always be resolved as a matter of law
noting that, “under Rule 10b-5, a duty to speak the full truth arises when a defendant undertakes a duty to say anything.”
stating that -43- questions of whether disclosures were sufficiently cautionary may not always be resolved as a matter of law
characterizing sufficiently suspicious trading as “presumptively probative of bad faith and scienter”
refusing to look beyond the four corners of the complaint when reviewing a motion to dismiss even though defendants claimed that the alleged insider stock sales \were innocuous because they were made in response to tax considerations\
reversing a dismissal of an omission-based claim alleging that the defendants made “various optimistic projections” but refused to disclose “material, firm- specific adverse facts that affect[ed] the validity or plausibility of that prediction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goldberg, Garwood, Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

173 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.