Asp v. TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a remedy fails of its essential purpose where “buyers of products governed by exclusive repair and replace warranties ... are able to show that repairing or replacing the product will not remedy the defect”
• finding the plaintiff did not dispute that he gave the defendant no opportunity to repair his DVR or provide him with a replacement
• “When parties acquiesce to the application of a particular state’s law, courts need not address choice of law questions.”
• “When parties acquiesce to the application of a particular state’s law, courts need not address choice of law questions.”
• ‘When parties acquiesce to the application of a particular state’s law, courts need not address choice of law questions.”
• “When parties acquiesce to the application of a particular state’s law, courts need not address choice of law questions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).