Skip to main content
E.D. Pennsylvania· 12/8/1983

Max Daetwyler Corp. v. Meyer

Citations

  • 575 F. Supp. 280
  • 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11029

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is the duty of the district judge faced with a motion for certification to analyze the strength of the arguments in opposition to the challenged ruling.”
  • “[T]he mere fact that the appeal would present a question of first impression is not, of itself, sufficient to show that the question is one on which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Louis H. Pollak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Max Daetwyler Corp. v. Meyer

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.