E.D. Pennsylvania· 12/8/1983
Max Daetwyler Corp. v. Meyer
Citations
- 575 F. Supp. 280
- 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11029
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is the duty of the district judge faced with a motion for certification to analyze the strength of the arguments in opposition to the challenged ruling.”
- “[T]he mere fact that the appeal would present a question of first impression is not, of itself, sufficient to show that the question is one on which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Louis H. Pollak
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Holly Flor and Rudolph Mangels, Debtors. Holly Flor and Rudolph Mangels, Debtors-Appellants v. Bot Financial Corp., Creditor-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1996-03-21· cited 246×
- Max Daetwyler Corp., a New York Corporation v. R. Meyer, a West German Corporation. Appeal of Rolf MeyerThird Circuit· 1985-06-18· cited 179×
- Rottmund v. Continental Assurance Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1992-12-14· cited 110×
- Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-01-22· cited 50×
- APCC Services, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co., LPDistrict of Columbia· 2003-12-17· cited 46×
- Kapossy v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.D. New Jersey· 1996-10-04· cited 45×
- First American Corp. v. Al-NahyanDistrict of Columbia· 1996-11-26· cited 45×
- Dorato ex rel. Wrongful Death Claim of Tillison v. SmithD. New Mexico· 2015-12-11· cited 31×
- Hulmes v. Honda Motor Company, Ltd.D. New Jersey· 1996-08-12· cited 28×
- XTO Energy, Inc. v. ATD, LLCD. New Mexico· 2016-05-31· cited 25×
- Harter v. GAF Corp.D. New Jersey· 1993-07-28· cited 24×
- Electric Mobility Corp. v. Bourns Sensors/Controls, Inc.D. New Jersey· 2000-03-13· cited 22×
- Voss v. Lincoln Mall Management Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-02-09· cited 21×
- P. Schoenfeld Asset Management LLC v. Cendant Corp.D. New Jersey· 2001-08-24· cited 21×
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2005-12-20· cited 21×
- Mueller v. First Nat. Bank of the Quad CitiesC.D. Illinois· 1992-02-12· cited 15×
- Bush v. AdamsE.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-05-07· cited 15×
- Neuner v. C.G. Realty Capital Ventures-I, L.P. (In Re Sharps Run Associates, L.P.)D. New Jersey· 1993-08-13· cited 14×
- Georgia State Conference of the NAACP v. Fayette County Board of CommissionersN.D. Georgia· 2013-07-03· cited 11×
- Piazza v. Major League BaseballE.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-10-14· cited 10×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationThird Circuit· 1974-04-09· cited 637×
- Cryomedics, Inc. v. Spembly, LimitedD. Connecticut· 1975-06-11· cited 45×
- Engineered Sports Products v. Brunswick Corp.D. Utah· 1973-06-12· cited 34×
- Superior Coal Co. v. Ruhrkohle A.G.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-08-14· cited 28×
- Alco Standard Corporation v. BenalalE.D. Pennsylvania· 1972-08-03· cited 24×
- Worldwide Marine Trading Corp. v. Marine Transport Service, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1981-10-28· cited 12×
- Max Daetwyler Corp. v. MeyerE.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-04-13· cited 5×
Other cases named Max Daetwyler Corp. v. Meyer
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.