Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
D. New Jersey· 10/4/1996

Kapossy v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Citations

  • 942 F. Supp. 996
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14776
  • 1996 WL 570476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that interlocutory appeal is “used sparingly” since it is “a deviation from the ordinary policy of avoiding piecemeal appellate review of trial court decisions which do not terminate the litigation”
  • stating that interlocutory appeal is “used sparingly” since it is “a deviation from the ordinary policy of avoiding piecemeal appellate review of trial court decisions which do not terminate the litigation”
  • stating that imterlocutory appeal under Section 1292(b) is “used sparingly” since it is “necessarily a deviation from the ordinary policy of avoiding piecemeal appellate review of trial court decisions which do not terminate the litigation”
  • only decision that supported plaintiff’s argument was not binding on court
  • “Claims cannot be ‘multiple claims,’ within the meaning of Rule 54(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orlofsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Kapossy v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.