Kapossy v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that interlocutory appeal is “used sparingly” since it is “a deviation from the ordinary policy of avoiding piecemeal appellate review of trial court decisions which do not terminate the litigation”
• stating that interlocutory appeal is “used sparingly” since it is “a deviation from the ordinary policy of avoiding piecemeal appellate review of trial court decisions which do not terminate the litigation”
• stating that imterlocutory appeal under Section 1292(b) is “used sparingly” since it is “necessarily a deviation from the ordinary policy of avoiding piecemeal appellate review of trial court decisions which do not terminate the litigation”
• only decision that supported plaintiff’s argument was not binding on court
• “Claims cannot be ‘multiple claims,’ within the meaning of Rule 54(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).