In Re Holly Flor and Rudolph Mangels, Debtors. Holly Flor and Rudolph Mangels, Debtors-Appellants v. Bot Financial Corp., Creditor-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that denial of a confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan is non- 19 final
• suggesting that a bankruptcy court’s order is “not final” where a “bankruptcy judge . . . neither dismisse[s]” nor converts the petition
• holding a denial of confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan is interlocutory and reasoning that the Second Circuit's 36 holding in Maiorino v. Bradford Savings Bank, a Chapter 13 case, \applies with comparable force\ in the Chapter 11 context
• holding a denial of confirmation of a Chapter 11 reorganization plan was non-final, but noting that its holding derived from an earlier case, which held that a denial of confirmation of a Chapter 13 reorganization plan was non- 47 final
• requiring such circumstances to “justify a departure from the basic policy of postponing appellate review until after the entry of a final judgment” and warrant the certifi- cation
• requiring such circumstances to “justify a departure from the basic policy of postponing appellate review until after the entry of a final judgment” and warrant the certifi- cation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).