Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that we have \consistently dismissed appeals from orders that did not finally determine either the action or some positive legal right of the appellant relating to the action\
• policy behind requiring final judgment before appeal is not served by allowing appeal of interlocutory order unless reversal would obviate need for trial
• “[T]he thrust of the rules governing the appellate process is that appeals should not be brought or considered piecemeal.”
• “[T]he thrust of the rules governing the appellate process is that appeals should not be brought or considered piecemeal.”
• noting the availability of discretionary review in “rare” cases
• noting Minnesota’s policy disfavoring piecemeal appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).