Skip to main content

Howard v. State

Citations

  • 899 S.E.2d 669
  • 318 Ga. 681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an enumeration of counsel’s ineffectiveness for failing to “file a motion to suppress the photo lineup” was insufficient to raise any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for our review
  • explaining that “a jury may infer a defendant’s criminal intent, and thereby find him guilty as a party to a crime, ‘from his presence, companionship, and conduct before, during, and after the offense’”
  • explaining that “a 58 jury may infer a defendant’s criminal intent, and thereby find him guilty as a party to a crime, ‘from his presence, companionship, and conduct before, during, and after the offense’”
  • considering 13 and giving significant weight to the certainty of the person who identified the defendant, while also giving great weight to the amount of time spent with that person before the crimes
  • “[A]n acquittal on one count is not itself a basis to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence as to another count.”
  • “When a defendant claims that his counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress evidence, he cannot show that his counsel performed deficiently unless he can show that the motion would have been granted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.