Skip to main content

Anderson v. State

Citations

  • 299 Ga. 193
  • 787 S.E.2d 202
  • 2016 WL 3144368
  • 2016 Ga. LEXIS 404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, where a count is vacated for sentencing purposes, the defendant is not convicted on that count, and a challenge to the sufficiency of evidence to support that count is moot
  • explaining that a defendant is not “convicted” on counts that are vacated or that merge with other offenses for sentencing purposes, and challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence to support those non-existent convictions are moot
  • defendant’s claims about sufficiency of evidence were moot for crimes that were vacated or that merged
  • defendant’s claims about sufficiency of evidence were moot for crimes that were vacated by operation of law or that merged with murder
  • defendant’s claims about sufficiency of evidence were moot for crimes that were vacated or that mergedr
  • a defendant is not “convicted” on counts that are vacated or that merge with other offenses for sentencing purposes, and challenges to the sufficiency of evidence to support those non-existent convictions are moot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.