Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 5/12/1982
Mata v. State
Citations
- 632 S.W.2d 355
- 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 902
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an informal hearing was sufficient
- defense counsel's unsworn statement about mental condition of defendant met the \evidence\ requirements of TEX.CODE CRIM. P. art. 46.02, § 4(a)
- “The evidence to which appellant points was insufficient to raise a bona fide doubt; therefore, the trial court was not required to hold a section 2 [inquiry], much less submit the question of appellant’s competency to a jury”
- court declined to decide whether a bona fide doubt as to appellant's competency was raised because trial judge's informal but effective questioning supported his determination not to empanel a jury to decide appellant's competency
- \The evidence must cause the court a bona fide doubt that the defendant has a sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding or that he lacks an understanding of the proceedings against him\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Odom, Davis, McCormick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-04-21· cited 684×
- McDaniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-02-26· cited 299×
- Collier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-12-18· cited 231×
- Alcott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-06-27· cited 193×
- Guzman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1996-05-16· cited 82×
- Casey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-06-12· cited 72×
- Brown v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1998-02-11· cited 58×
- Marbut v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2002-05-22· cited 53×
- Salahud-Din v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-11-16· cited 44×
- Eddie v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-06-11· cited 44×
- Greene v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2007-02-07· cited 38×
- Duke v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-08-11· cited 37×
- Alcott v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-09-13· cited 32×
- Peterson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1997-11-26· cited 31×
- Reed v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-07-17· cited 29×
- Loftin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-11-09· cited 27×
- Kostura v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-08-20· cited 20×
- Hatten v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1998-03-12· cited 8×
- Atomanczyk v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1989-08-24· cited 8×
- Ott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1985-05-02· cited 7×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Scamardo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-10-30· cited 330×
- Von Byrd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-07-12· cited 162×
- Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-10-21· cited 155×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-02-06· cited 132×
- McWherter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-11-12· cited 124×
- Sisco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-02-06· cited 110×
- Boney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-09-27· cited 71×
- McElroy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-06-04· cited 62×
- Dinn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-09-20· cited 61×
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-02-24· cited 51×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-10-01· cited 39×
- Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-02-06· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.