Skip to main content

Mata v. State

Citations

  • 632 S.W.2d 355
  • 1982 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 902

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an informal hearing was sufficient
  • defense counsel's unsworn statement about mental condition of defendant met the \evidence\ requirements of TEX.CODE CRIM. P. art. 46.02, § 4(a)
  • “The evidence to which appellant points was insufficient to raise a bona fide doubt; therefore, the trial court was not required to hold a section 2 [inquiry], much less submit the question of appellant’s competency to a jury”
  • court declined to decide whether a bona fide doubt as to appellant's competency was raised because trial judge's informal but effective questioning supported his determination not to empanel a jury to decide appellant's competency
  • \The evidence must cause the court a bona fide doubt that the defendant has a sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding or that he lacks an understanding of the proceedings against him\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Odom, Davis, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.