Skip to main content

Porter v. State

Citations

  • 623 S.W.2d 374
  • 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statements made about communications between police officers and dispatchers were admissible at trial to show circumstances leading up to shooting
  • holding evidence that defendant had committed a robbery eleven days earlier was relevant to show his motive
  • admission of evidence that the defendant shot the victim to avoid being apprehended for an armed robbery that the defendant committed eleven days earlier
  • The trial court's decision to deny a defendant's motion for psychiatric testing will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.
  • The trial court's decision to deny a defendant's motion for psychiatric testing will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.
  • extra-judicial statement offered for purpose of showing what was said rather than for truth of matter stated therein does not constitute hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dally, Clinton, Teague, State

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

103 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.