Skip to main content

Robinson v. State

Citations

  • 596 S.W.2d 130
  • 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1095

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that omission of “imminent” from jury instruction on element of placing another in fear of imminent bodily injury or death was not error
  • observing that prior version of the penal code required a completed theft to prove aggravated robbery
  • “[N]o completed theft is required in order for the proscribed conduct to constitute the offense of robbery”
  • \The display of a deadly weapon of and within itself constitutes a threat of the required imminent harm.\
  • A [T]he display of a deadly weapon of and within itself constitutes a threat of the required imminent harm. @
  • “The display of a deadly weapon of and within itself constitutes a threat of the required imminent harm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

103 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.