Von Byrd v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no evidence that the defendant’s confession was involuntary as a result of investigating officer’s course of conduct
• stating that it is “well established that the [defendant] has a right to challenge for cause any juror who could not give the minimum punishment”
• stating that it is “well established that the [defendant] has a right to challenge for cause any juror who could not give the minimum punishment”
• holding the failure to object to testimony regarding extraneous offenses “waives any error to the admission of evidence”
• stating that it is “well established that the [defendant] has a right to challenge for cause any juror who could not give the minimum punishment”
• stating that it is A well established that the [defendant] has a right to challenge for cause any juror who could not give the minimum punishment @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).