Skip to main content

Casey v. State

Citations

  • 924 S.W.2d 946
  • 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 79
  • 1996 WL 313143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that sentencing is part of trial and competency considerations apply
  • stating that sentencing is part of trial and competency considerations apply
  • stating that sentencing is part of trial and competency considerations apply
  • vacating and remanding with instructions for the appellate court to abate for same
  • raising issue of incompetency is not equivalent to receiving section 2(b) hearing when trial court does not evaluate evidence to determine if it supports a finding of incompetency to stand trial
  • accused must be competent to be sentenced at time probation revoked

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, McCormick, Mansfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.