Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 11/9/2006

Martinez v. State

Citations

204 S.W.3d 914
2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 9792
2006 WL 3234033

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, the Marks rule notwithstanding, \the plurality opinion [in Seibert] is more persuasive and therefore governs\
noting that appellant “was repeating the polygra-pher’s general statements regarding the crime [that three people were shot], not his own unwarned statements”
noting that appellant “was repeating the polygrapher’s general statements regarding the crime [that three people were shot], not his own unwarned statements”
noting that a “record was not created of the questions, statements, or results of the polygraph examination”
applying these factors to uphold admissibility of appellant's voluntary custodial statement
applying these factors to uphold admissibility of appellant’s voluntary custodial statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yanez and Castillo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.