Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 686 A.2d 1130
  • 113 Md. App. 190
  • 1996 Md. App. LEXIS 181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that trial judge’s factual determinations regarding venue were not clearly erroneous
  • holding that the element of “force or threat of force” 14 obviously means more than the mere physical exertion required to engage in a sexual act against the will and without the consent of the other person
  • holding that an officer did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his police cruiser because, even though he was allowed to use it while off-duty, there were strict regulations governing how the vehicle was used and permitting frequent inspections
  • recognizing de novo review concerning question of whether defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy
  • caressing a victim’s genital area is legally sufficient evidence of “sexual contact” under § 461(f)
  • sexual assault claim by a female against a male officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.