Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 12/30/1996
Martin v. State
Citations
- 686 A.2d 1130
- 113 Md. App. 190
- 1996 Md. App. LEXIS 181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that trial judge’s factual determinations regarding venue were not clearly erroneous
- holding that the element of “force or threat of force” 14 obviously means more than the mere physical exertion required to engage in a sexual act against the will and without the consent of the other person
- holding that an officer did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his police cruiser because, even though he was allowed to use it while off-duty, there were strict regulations governing how the vehicle was used and permitting frequent inspections
- recognizing de novo review concerning question of whether defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy
- caressing a victim’s genital area is legally sufficient evidence of “sexual contact” under § 461(f)
- sexual assault claim by a female against a male officer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-07-08· cited 36×
- State v. MayersCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-22· cited 27×
- State v. Russell G. JonesIdaho Supreme Court· 2013-04-01· cited 24×
- Pettit v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-21· cited 19×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-06-25· cited 9×
- Ocean City Police Department v. MarshallCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-19· cited 8×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-25· cited 5×
- Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. ShockleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-01-31· cited 4×
- Perez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-29· cited 4×
- Powell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-10· cited 3×
- In Re JAMES R.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-30· cited 3×
- Way v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-09-09· cited 2×
- State v. Russell G. JonesIdaho Court of Appeals· 2011-09-12
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-09-02
Cites
55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 4,303×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court· 1995-11-29· cited 1,729×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 1,543×
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,437×
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court· 1961-03-20· cited 1,412×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.