Skip to main content

Perez v. State

Citations

  • 29 A.3d 656
  • 201 Md. App. 276
  • 2011 Md. App. LEXIS 132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that the jury find that the state prove “that the sexual . . . contact was made against the will and without consent of [the victim].”
  • “the court was required to provide a supplemental instruction to resolve the jury’s confusion” where “the issue ... was central to the jury’s decision in this case, and its definition was not fairly covered by any of the other jury instructions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panel: Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.