Cushman v. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that veterans’ benefits are a protected property interest under the Fifth Amendment, because they are statutorily mandated and nondiscretionary in nature
• holding that veterans’ benefits are a protected property interest under the Fifth Amendment, because they are statutorily mandated and nondiscretionary in nature
• holding that veterans' benefits are a protected property interest under the Fifth Amendment, because they are statutorily mandated and nondiscretionary in nature
• holding that entitlement to benefits is a property interest protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
• holding that a veteran's \entitlement to [disability] benefits is a property interest protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution\
• noting that a fundamentally fair adjudication within a procedural framework is constitutionally required in all cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).