In Re Barr Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that that the unfair treatment of a particular applicant could warrant judicial relief since it would “then advance the cause of equal treatment”
• recognizing that an “agency is in a unique—and authoritative—position to . . . allocate its resources in the optimal way”
• recognizing that [] the unfair treatment of a particular applicant could warrant judicial relief since it would “then advance the cause of equal treatment”
• concluding that delay was not unreasonable where other TRAC 27 factors favored relief but the relief would leap-frog plaintiff to the head of a queue of agency adjudications while producing no net gain
• explaining that, although the agency missed a statutory deadline, “a finding that delay is unreasonable does not, alone, justify judicial intervention”
• suggesting that judicial intervention may be warranted if a plaintiff were “singled . . . out for especially bad treatment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).