Skip to main content
· 4/3/2002

Carl v. Lamb, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Citations

  • 284 F.3d 1378
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 5956
  • 2002 WL 500371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a writ of mandamus cannot be used as a substitute for an appeal
  • explaining that a writ of mandamus cannot be used as a substitute for an appeal
  • explaining that a writ of mandamus cannot be used as a substitute for an appeal
  • explaining that a writ of mandamus may not be used as a substitute for an appeal
  • explaining that a writ of mandamus can- not be used as a substitute for an appeal
  • finding that a fifteen-month delay in adjudicating a claim did not constitute an extraordinary delay warranting mandamus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedman, Lourie, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.