Third Circuit· 9/11/2002

Marshall v. Hendricks

Citations

307 F.3d 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting structural deficiencies, but not mere allegations of error, can surmount Stone
“An erroneous or summary resolution by a state court of a Fourth Amendment claim does not overcome the bar.”
“The standard for materiality [under Brady] is the same as that iterated in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984).”
the existence of alternative, even more preferable or more effective, strategies does not 20 satisfy the first element of the Strickland test
“Given the unanimity requirement, the ‘reasonable probability of a different outcome’ would mean that only one juror need weigh the factors differently and find that the aggravating factor did not outweigh” the mitigating factors
trial court erred in not applying “lost or missing evidence” inference regarding video footage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

90 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.