Marshall v. Hendricks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting in same case on remand that counsel’s “failure to investigate [was] particularly troubling given the apparent plethora of potentially useful mitigation witnesses available[,]” and holding that habeas grant was warranted
• “Although several Supreme Court decisions have applied Strickland to ineffective assistance of counsel claims at the sentencing phase of a capital trial, all are factually distinguishable from the present case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).