United States v. Percy Travillion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the location of both conspiracies to be the Western District of Pennsylvania
• “a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is reviewed much less favorably than a direct appeal[.]”
• “[I]ssues resolved in a prior direct appeal will not be reviewed again by way of a § 2255 motion . . . .”
• “a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is reviewed much less favorably than a direct appeal of the sentence.”
• “a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is reviewed much less favorably than a direct appeal[.]”
• “We may address the prejudice prong first ‘[i]f it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice.’” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).