United States v. Matthew Lagrone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “in order for a defendant to invoke his Miranda rights the authorities must be conducting interrogation, or interrogation must be imminent”
• taking the view that there are certain “windows of opportunity” within which a defendant must assert his Miranda right to counsel
• taking the view that there are certain “windows of opportunity” within which a defendant must assert his Miranda right to counsel
• officer read consent‐to‐search form aloud and defendant‐ arrestee initialed each line before signing the form
• a defendant’s request to consult his attorney was regarding whether to consent to a search of his property, not about an interrogation, and therefore was not considered an invocation of Miranda rights
• “A person in custody has no federal constitutional right to consult with an attorney before consenting to a search of his property. However, the Indiana [C]onstitution does afford such a right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).