Marlar v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a PCR court fails to make specific findings as to an issue, a Rule 59(e) motion is necessary to preserve the issue for appeal
• holding, \a Rule 59(e) motion must be filed if issues are not adequately addressed\ in the PCR order
• providing \a Rule 59(e) motion must be filed if issues are not adequately addressed\ in the PCR order
• ‘‘[T]he PCR judge must make specific findings of fact and state expressly the conclusions of law relating to each issue presented. The failure to specifically rule on the issues precludes appellate review of the issues.”
• \[T]he PCR judge must make specific findings of fact and state expressly the conclusions of law relating to each issue presented. The failure to specifically rule on the issues precludes appellate review of the issues.\
• \reiterat[ing] our admonition\ from Pruitt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bostick v. Stevenson
  Fourth Circuit· 2009-12-23· cited 41×
• Mangal v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-07-19· cited 24×
• Tappeiner v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-05-04· cited 15×
• Simmons v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-06-08· cited 10×
• Thomas v. Eagleton
  D. South Carolina· 2010-03-04· cited 4×
• Ramirez v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-01-05· cited 4×
• Reese v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-10-18· cited 4×
• Burgess v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-02-20· cited 2×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-02-08· cited 1×
• Fishburne v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-07-31
• Freiburger v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-02-11

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Humbert v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-06-25· cited 34×
• Pruitt v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-10-05· cited 31×
• Marlar v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-03-26· cited 5×