Fishburne v. State
Syllabus
This case stems from the post-conviction relief (PCR) court's denial of relief to Derrick Fishburne. Because the PCR court's order contains no findings of fact as to one of Fishburne's primary PCR claims, we remand this matter to the PCR court for the PCR court to issue an order setting forth adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding Fishburne's unaddressed PCR claim. In doing so, we again stress that PCR orders must be prepared in compliance with section 17-27-80 of the South Carolina Code (2014) and Rule 52(a) of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Herron v. CENTURY BMWSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-12-19· cited 110×
- Humbert v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-06-25· cited 34×
- Pruitt v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-10-05· cited 31×
- Hall v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-08-09· cited 19×
- Marlar v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-11-05· cited 19×
- Turner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-08-24· cited 15×
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-06-08· cited 10×
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-12-14· cited 7×
- McCullough v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-11-14· cited 5×
- Bryson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-11-17· cited 4×
- Reese v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-10-18· cited 4×
- Hilton v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-02-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.