Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2/8/2012
Smith v. State
Citations
- 404 S.C. 493
- 745 S.E.2d 378
- 2012 WL 386620
- 2012 S.C. App. LEXIS 42
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding an applicant failed to meet his burden of proof where he failed to present testimony from any of the witnesses he assets should have been called at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huff, Lockemy, Pieper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. FreiburgerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-09-26· cited 89×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-02-16· cited 59×
- Ard v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-03-05· cited 59×
- Glover v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-06-19· cited 42×
- Lomax v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-07-28· cited 28×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-19· cited 27×
- Bannister v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-12-14· cited 21×
- Marlar v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-11-05· cited 19×
- Simuel v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-10-25· cited 19×
- Kolle v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-02-16· cited 18×
- Moorehead v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-12· cited 17×
- Skeen v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-02-03· cited 15×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-03-10· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.