Marlar v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a PCR court fails to make specific findings as to an issue, a Rule 59(e) motion is necessary to preserve the issue for appeal
• holding, \a Rule 59(e) motion must be filed if issues are not adequately addressed\ in the PCR order
• providing \a Rule 59(e) motion must be filed if issues are not adequately addressed\ in the PCR order
• ‘‘[T]he PCR judge must make specific findings of fact and state expressly the conclusions of law relating to each issue presented. The failure to specifically rule on the issues precludes appellate review of the issues.”
• \[T]he PCR judge must make specific findings of fact and state expressly the conclusions of law relating to each issue presented. The failure to specifically rule on the issues precludes appellate review of the issues.\
• \reiterat[ing] our admonition\ from Pruitt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).