Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/5/2017
Ramirez v. State
Citations
- 419 S.C. 14
- 795 S.E.2d 841
- 2017 S.C. LEXIS 2
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding error because \there are no findings of fact contained within the PCR court's order to support its conclusion\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hearn, Beatty, Kittredge, Few, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 215×
- Suber v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-01-22· cited 53×
- Van Sellner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-06-29· cited 48×
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-06-20· cited 44×
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-23· cited 40×
- Gallman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-02-24· cited 28×
- Lomax v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-07-28· cited 28×
- Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-12-11· cited 22×
- Marlar v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-11-05· cited 19×
- Hudson ex rel. Hudson v. Lancaster Convalescent CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-01-08· cited 13×
- Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-04-26· cited 9×
- Staggs v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-04-02· cited 7×
- Ramirez v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-07-29· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.