Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Arizona Supreme Court· 12/18/1990

Carrow Co. v. Lusby

Citations

  • 804 P.2d 747
  • 167 Ariz. 18
  • 76 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 7
  • 1990 Ariz. LEXIS 258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an owner of livestock in open range territory owes a duty of care to motorists travelling on a public highway
  • paraphrasing Markowitz: “To postulate that the owner of livestock has no duty at all [to motorists on public highways] is to postulate that the owner can never be liable, no matter what the circumstances.”
  • absent manifest legislative intent to the contrary, statutes are to be construed as consistent with the common law
  • “The courts findings with respect to grounds for termination shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence under the rules applicable and adhering to the trial of civil causes.”
  • “Legislative intent often can be discovered by examining the development of a particular statute.”
  • absent a clear expression of legislative intent to repeal the common law rule, courts usually construe statutes consistently with common law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corcoran, Cameron, Gordon, Feldman, Moeller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Carrow Co. v. Lusby

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.