Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that plaintiff satisfies burden by presenting facts from which causal relationship may be inferred, but cannot leave causation to jury’s speculation
• holding that summary judgment is appropriate where the plaintiffs evidence “leav[es] causation to the jury’s speculation”
• recognizing that plaintiff satisfies burden by presenting facts from which causal relationship may be inferred but cannot leave causation to the jury’s speculation
• holding that summary judgment is appropriate where the plaintiffs evidence “leav[es] causation to the jury’s speculation”
• holding that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on issue of intervening and superseding cause
• holding plaintiff satisfies burden by presenting facts from which causal relationship may be inferred but cannot leave causation to jury’s speculation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).