· 11/9/1995
Hafner v. Beck
Citations
- 916 P.2d 1105
- 185 Ariz. 389
- 203 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 16
- 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 252
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no duty to claimant given an independent psychological examination for worker’s compensation purposes because there was no doctor-patient relationship
- finding no duty to claimant given an independent psychological examination for worker's compensation purposes because there was no doctor-patient relationship
- “We do not understand the law to be that one owes a duty of reasonable care at all times to all people under all circumstances.”
- “We do not understand the law to be that one owes a duty of reasonable care at all times to all people under all circumstances.”
- “We do not understand the law to be that one owes a duty of reasonable care at all times to all people under all circumstances.”
- “Although standards for experts’ qualifications and admissibility of their opinions have been stretched considerably, we have not yet reached the point when experts can dictate the law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pelander, Livermore, Fernandez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.