Skip to main content
· 11/9/1995

Hafner v. Beck

Citations

  • 916 P.2d 1105
  • 185 Ariz. 389
  • 203 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 16
  • 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no duty to claimant given an independent psychological examination for worker’s compensation purposes because there was no doctor-patient relationship
  • finding no duty to claimant given an independent psychological examination for worker's compensation purposes because there was no doctor-patient relationship
  • “We do not understand the law to be that one owes a duty of reasonable care at all times to all people under all circumstances.”
  • “We do not understand the law to be that one owes a duty of reasonable care at all times to all people under all circumstances.”
  • “We do not understand the law to be that one owes a duty of reasonable care at all times to all people under all circumstances.”
  • “Although standards for experts’ qualifications and admissibility of their opinions have been stretched considerably, we have not yet reached the point when experts can dictate the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pelander, Livermore, Fernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.