Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 7/8/2016

Mark Gomez v. Ericsson, Inc.

Citations

  • 828 F.3d 367
  • 62 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1560
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12604
  • 2016 WL 3669965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “a great deal of discretion” when administrator had to decide whether, among other things, “good reason” existed for employee’s departure
  • “He tries a new argument not raised before the administrator . . . . But we cannot consider an argument that a plan did not first have the opportunity to assess.”
  • “He tries a new argument not raised before the administrator . . . . But we cannot consider an argument that a plan did not first have the opportunity to assess.”
  • “Even for plans that result in only a lump-sum payment, [an ongoing] administrative scheme can be found in a number of other features,” such as “the estab- lishment of procedures for handling claims and appeals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Barksdale, Costa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.