Fifth Circuit· 7/8/2016
Mark Gomez v. Ericsson, Inc.
Citations
- 828 F.3d 367
- 62 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1560
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12604
- 2016 WL 3669965
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding “a great deal of discretion” when administrator had to decide whether, among other things, “good reason” existed for employee’s departure
- “He tries a new argument not raised before the administrator . . . . But we cannot consider an argument that a plan did not first have the opportunity to assess.”
- “He tries a new argument not raised before the administrator . . . . But we cannot consider an argument that a plan did not first have the opportunity to assess.”
- “Even for plans that result in only a lump-sum payment, [an ongoing] administrative scheme can be found in a number of other features,” such as “the estab- lishment of procedures for handling claims and appeals.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Barksdale, Costa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court· 1996-03-19· cited 1,806×
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court· 1987-06-01· cited 1,315×
- Jack D. Denton v. First National Bank of Waco, TexasFirst Circuit· 1985-07-22· cited 181×
- Giles v. NYLCare Health Plans, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1999-04-09· cited 148×
- Mary R. Wells v. General Motors CorporationFifth Circuit· 1989-09-28· cited 96×
- Mary Smith v. Regional Transit Authority, eFifth Circuit· 2014-06-23· cited 82×
- John E. Fontenot v. Nl Industries, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1992-02-19· cited 76×
- Burell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaFifth Circuit· 2016-04-11· cited 75×
- William R. PERDUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BURGER KING CORPORATION, Craig Bushey, and the Benefits Committee, Defendants-AppelleesFifth Circuit· 1993-12-01· cited 62×
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Flores-GalarzaFirst Circuit· 2003-02-04· cited 57×
- Stone v. UNOCAL Termination Allowance PlanFifth Circuit· 2009-05-28· cited 40×
- Allan Tinoco Valssilios Voulgarakis v. Marine Chartering Company, Inc., and as Successor in Interest to Marine Management and Consultant, Ltd.Fifth Circuit· 2002-10-31· cited 26×
- J.R. Whittemore v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1992-09-21· cited 24×
- John Clayton v. ConocoPhillips CompanyFifth Circuit· 2013-07-04· cited 23×
- Ebenstein v. Ericsson Internet Applications, Inc.E.D. New York· 2003-05-05· cited 4×
- Gautier-Figueroa v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Puerto Rico, Inc.D. Puerto Rico· 2012-02-29· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.