Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 5/28/2009

Stone v. UNOCAL Termination Allowance Plan

Citations

  • 570 F.3d 252
  • 46 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2795
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11647
  • 2009 WL 1479405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the conflict of interest is not considered when determining whether an administrator’s interpretation of the plan is legally correct and only bears on whether there was an abuse of discretion
  • “The most important factor in this three-part analysis is whether the administrator’s interpretation was consistent with a fair reading of the plan.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Dennis, Prado

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Stone v. UNOCAL Termination Allowance Plan

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.