Ebenstein v. Ericsson Internet Applications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Ericsson’s plans fell under ERISA and thereby gave rise to federal jurisdiction
• “Notably, the [] agreement applies to all employees and was not drafted for a single event such as a plant closing. As such, the plan can reasonably be interpreted as an ongoing commitment on the part of the Company.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).