United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Flores-Galarza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 49 U.S.C. $5 13102, 14501(c)(2)(B) did not permit Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to impose excise tax on household goods deliveries by carrier that did not perform specialized services
• holding that 49 U.S.C. § 13102 , 14501 (c)(2)(B) did not permit Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to impose excise tax on household goods deliveries by carrier that did not perform specialized services
• “Forcing carriers to give special handling to all packages containing goods used in a home ... would resurrect the unwieldy patchwork of state laws that Congress intended' to eliminate through the [FAA Authorization Act].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).