Skip to main content
· 9/23/1998

Marden v. Dinin

Citations

  • 22 F. Supp. 2d 180
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15047
  • 1998 WL 661251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he first prong of the collateral estoppel test is met because issues essential to plaintiff’s First Amendment claim (i.e. the existence of a retaliatory scheme and the reasons for his discharge) were decided adversely to him in the prior [Article 78] proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.