Crosland v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that actions by different supervisors in different departments mitigates against finding a continuous violation
• holding that actions by different supervisors in different departments mitigates against finding a continuing violation
• “The [continuing violation] doctrine has generally been limited to situations where there are specific policies or mechanisms, such as discriminatory seniority lists or employment tests”
• “[F]ailure to promote do[es] not constitute a continuing violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).