Marczeski v. Law

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Were the plaintiff not pro se, the Court would have stricken all filings after the reply brief. However, . . .given the latitude that must be afforded pro se litigants, the Court has allowed these filings.”
• “Were the plaintiff not pro se, the Court would have stricken all filings after the reply brief. However, . . .given the latitude that must be afforded pro se litigants, the Court has allowed these filings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).