Vincent MOODIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “§ 297(9) deprives the district court of subject matter jurisdiction”
• a state law depriving its courts of jurisdiction over a state law claim also divests a federal court of jurisdiction to decide the claim
• where NYSDHR dismissed complaint on the basis that employer “was not subject to the jurisdiction of the [NYSHRL],” subsequent claim in court was barred
• \Both the language of the statute and its consistent judicial interpretation establish that § 297(9) poses an insuperable jurisdictional bar.\
• “[A] state law depriving its courts of jurisdiction over a state law claim also operates to divest a federal court of jurisdiction to decide the claim.”
• “[A] state law depriving its courts of jurisdiction over a state law 9 claim also operates to divest a federal court of jurisdiction to decide the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).