Skip to main content

Mann v. State

Citations

  • 13 S.W.3d 89
  • 2000 WL 35805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a proper threshold inquiry consisted of an oral proffer from the State, and no evidentiary hearing was required
  • holding that a proper threshold inquiry consisted of an oral proffer from the State, and no evidentiary hearing was required
  • holding that the prosecutor’s statement that he intended to offer extraneous offense evidence through defendant’s ex-wife who would testify as to some physical abuse by defendant was sufficient for purposes of making a threshold determination of relevance
  • holding that the prosecutor = s statement that he intended to offer extraneous offense evidence through defendant = s ex-wife who would testify as to some physical abuse by defendant was sufficient for purposes of making a threshold determination of relevance
  • concluding that evidence was sufficient to support deadly- weapon finding in DWI context and relying, in part, on opinion testimony by an officer experienced in reconstructing accidents that a collision under the circumstances in that case was capable of causing death or serious bodily injury
  • explaining that \[a]ll felonies are theoretically susceptible to an affirmative weapon finding\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Kidd, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.