Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 795 S.W.2d 171
  • 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 67
  • 1990 WL 55049

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that audio portions of video should be admitted when questioning did not call for testimony responses
  • noting that requests for breath specimens seek physical evidence, not testimonial confessions of guilt
  • noting that requests for breath specimens seek physical evidence, not testimonial confessions of guilt
  • questions by officer conducting a field sobriety test, including asking name and date of birth, were not interrogation
  • questions by officer conducting a field sobriety test, including asking name and date of birth, were not interrogation
  • audio and visual recordings admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Clinton, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

161 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.