Skip to main content

Harrell v. State

Citations

  • 884 S.W.2d 154
  • 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 104
  • 1994 WL 511409

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the standard of admissibility for extraneous offense evidence is proof beyond a reasonable doubt
  • holding that standard of admissibility for extraneous offense evidence is proof beyond reasonable doubt
  • holding that standard of admissibility for extraneous offense evidence is proof beyond reasonable doubt
  • recognizing but rejecting standard of proof set out in Huddleston for conditionally relevant evidence under Criminal Rule 104(b)
  • recognizing but rejecting standard of proof set out in Huddleston for conditionally relevant evidence under Criminal Rule 104(b)
  • recognizing but rejecting standard of proof set out in Huddleston for conditionally relevant evidence under Criminal Rule 104(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maloney, Clinton, White, Campbell, Mecormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

131 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.