Brister, Mark Randall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the record evidence did not allow for a reasonable inference that appellant used his motor vehicle as a deadly weapon
• concluding that motor vehicle was not deadly weapon because there was no evidence there were any cars in oncoming lane of traffic into which he briefly crossed
• concluding that the evidence was insufficient to support a deadly weapon finding when the evidence showed appellant was intoxicated and “briefly crossed the center line into the oncoming lane of traffic at a time at which there were very few, if any, cars in that lane”
• stating “actual danger” refers to risk of “death or serious bodily injury”
• stating “actual danger” refers to risk of “death or serious bodily injury”
• “When based upon facts an experienced officer observes and then describes to the jury, an officer’s opinion concerning a person’s intoxication provides sufficient evidence of intoxication.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Brister, Mark Randall

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Brister, Mark Randall
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-11-18
• Brister, Mark Randall
  Texas Supreme Court· 2015-01-05