Skip to main content
· 11/15/1877

Mann v. Scott

Citations

  • 32 Ark. 593

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the contractor’s submission was not viewed as a defective CDA claim, but as a properly-certified REA. The contractor even states in its submission that it is certifying its REA “[p]ursuant to DFAR 252.243–7002”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: English

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.