Jones v. State
Citations
- 44 Fla. 74
Syllabus
<p>1. An application for a continuance upon the ground of the absence of a witness must show that the applicant has exercised due diligence to procure the attendance of the witness.</p> <p>2. Denial of a motion for continuance will not be reversed by an appellate court unless there has been a palpable abuse of discretion, clearly and affirmatively shown by the record.</p> <p>3. A statement made in the order of a trial court as to a matter in pais will be presumed to be correct, unless the contrary is made clearly apparent.</p> <p>4. A statement or declaration of a person charged with crime is not rendered inadmissible in evidence against him by the mere fact that it is made after the commission of the crime. If it tends to show a guilty intent it is admissible, for the guilty intent of a party may be shown by his acts, conduct and declarations, before, at the time of, or after the commission of a criminal act.</p> <p>6. The opinion of a witness, except as to the matter regarding which expert testimony is competent is not legitimate evidence as to any matter that may be reproduced before the jury. It is the province of the jury to deduce its own conclusion from facts of common experience, uninfluenced by the opinion of any witness on those facts, especially where such opinion is sought on facts given in the testimony of another witness.</p> <p>6. A question aslsed a non-expert witness, seeking to elicit his opinion as to what must have been the necessary position of the hand and pistol of the person who shot another in a particular manner, where the witness did not see the person who shot, or the hand that held the pistol when it was shot, is properly excluded.</p> <p>7. Where alleged error in giving two or more charges, asserting distinct propositions of law is made the basis of a single ground of a motion for a new trial, alleging generally; ithat the court erred in giving such charges, and excepted to under and by virtue of an -exception to the denial of the motio
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statute construed to render it constitutional, even if reasonably susceptible of another, unconstitutional interpretation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Blair v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-11-25· cited 63×
- Darty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-03-04· cited 38×
- Kersey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-04-05· cited 32×
- Clements v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 29×
- Maloy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 27×
- Reynolds v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-01-15· cited 15×
- State v. PiehlSupreme Court of Florida· 1966-03-23· cited 11×
- Kinnon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-18· cited 4×
- Rogers v. Visioneering Concrete Construction Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-07-10· cited 3×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eggart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-06-15· cited 52×
- Cooper v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1859-07-01· cited 51×
- People v. WestlakeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1882-12-12· cited 44×
- Ballard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1893-01-15· cited 38×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1880-01-15· cited 35×
- Mann v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1887-06-15· cited 34×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1892-03-19· cited 31×
- Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-06-15· cited 26×
- McCoggle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 20×
- Waldron v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-01-15· cited 6×
- State v. ParceSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1885-03-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.