Peeler v. State
Citations
- 64 Fla. 385
Syllabus
<p>1. Where one exception or one assignment of error embraces en masse the giving or the refusals to give several separate instructions, stating distinct propositions of law, such exception or assignment of error will not be considered by the appellate court except so far as is necessary to ascertain if any one of the several instructions thus aggregated was properly given or refused.</p> <p>2. It is not error to refuse charges that are not applicable to the evidence or that are in effect covered by other charges given.</p> <p>3. Where the verdict is amply supported by the evidence and no errors of law or of procedure appear in the transcript, the judgment will be affirmed.</p>
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1926-04-28· cited 17×
- Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-11-17· cited 16×
- Mercer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-05-05· cited 15×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-11-11· cited 8×
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-02-26· cited 7×
- Hollingsworth v. NorrisSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-04-21· cited 7×
- Carnley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1924-10-18· cited 7×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.