Wilson v. Johnson
Citations
- 51 Fla. 370
Syllabus
<p>1. Objections interposed to the introduction in evidence of a written instrument which do not appear upon the face thereof but would have to be proved by extraneous evidence should be overruled.</p> <p>2. The trial court is authorized to regulate the order of the introduction of evidence, and its discretion in this matter will only be interfered with by an appellate court where clearly abused.</p> <p>3. A motion to strike out evidence that has been introduced in a cause must be predicated upon some feature of irrelevancy, incompetency, legal inadmissibility, or impertinency in the evidence itself. Where evidence has been introduced by a party, whether plaintiff or defendant, that in itself is pertinent, relevant, legal and proper so far as it goes, but which, in thb conception of the opposite party, falls short, for the want of proof of other necessary facts, the proper practice for such party is to ask for appropriate instructions from the court to the jury.</p> <p>4. If the plaintiff in an action of ejectment claims title by descent, it is sufficient for him, in the first instance, to prove his heirship, and that the-ancestor under whom he claims was the person last seized of the lands in controversy.</p> <p>5. After either or both parties have rested, the admission or exclusion of further evidence is in ike discretion of the judge; and this discretion extends to evidence offered during and after the argument and even after the cause has been submitted to the jury, but an exception may be taken, and if the ruling be an abuse of discretion relief may be had from an appellate court.</p> <p>6. An application for a postponement or a continuance is addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the trial court, and the ruling of the trial court either granting or denying such application will not be reversed by an appellate court unless an abuse of this discretion is clearly shown.</p> <p>7. Courts of Justice exist for the administration and furtherance of Justice an
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 120×
- Anderson v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1917-02-23· cited 84×
- Clinton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 60×
- Gunn v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida· 1914-01-27· cited 52×
- Putnal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 44×
- Padgett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-06-15· cited 44×
- Richbourg v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 35×
- Kersey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-04-05· cited 32×
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 30×
- Malsby v. GambleSupreme Court of Florida· 1911-01-15· cited 30×
- Bova v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-02-25· cited 29×
- Maloy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 27×
- Tully v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-06-03· cited 22×
- Platt v. RowandSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 20×
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 18×
- Sylvia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-05-07· cited 16×
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DeesSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 16×
- Investment Co. v. Trueman ex rel. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-01-15· cited 16×
- Winn v. CogginsSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 15×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 15×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coogler v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida· 1889-06-15· cited 47×
- Peacock v. FeasterSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 21×
- Weaver v. RushSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1896-02-08· cited 19×
- Johnson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-06-15· cited 6×
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-06-15· cited 6×
- Jones v. BlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1886-02-01· cited 6×
- Hoey v. FletcherSupreme Court of Florida· 1897-01-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.